29.10.2012 17:31, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 09:08:41AM +0000, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>> This is a follow-up to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861309
>>
>> If one has USB disks configured for domain with explicit <address/>,
libvirtd
>> ignores that node when building qemu command line. So, disk is connected to
>> the first free USB port implicitly by qemu.
>> That breaks other USB devices which have explicit <address/> - ports they
>> should be connected to may be already occupied by disks.
>>
>> With first patch applied, if one has USB disk connected to the USB hub, qemu
>> fails to start, because it does not know anything about hubs yet (when parsing
disks).
>> That's why second patch is needed.
>>
>> Vladislav Bogdanov (2):
>> qemu: Do not ignore address for USB disks
>> qemu: pass -usb and usb hubs earlier, so USB disks with static
>> address are handled properly
>
> ACK to both
Could they be committed before 1.1.0?
I do not have rights.
Vladislav