On 07/05/2011 05:55 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 03:45:52AM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
> domain.rng, network.rng, and interface.rng already use a few of the
> same types (or in some cases *should* but don't), and an upcoming code
> change will have them sharing even more. To prepare for that, this
> patch takes those common data type definitions and moves them into
> basictypes.rng.
>
> This may break some rule about the need to RNG files to be autonomous
> or something, but I saw that storageencryption.rng is used in this
> way, so I figured it must not be completely against the law...
> ---
> docs/schemas/Makefile.am | 1 +
> docs/schemas/basictypes.rng | 130 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> docs/schemas/domain.rng | 86 +---------------------------
> docs/schemas/interface.rng | 71 ++++-------------------
> docs/schemas/network.rng | 79 +++++++-------------------
> libvirt.spec.in | 1 +
> 6 files changed, 168 insertions(+), 200 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 docs/schemas/basictypes.rng
Oh, you need to change mingw32-libvirt.spec.in too
Okay, I made that change and pushed the result. (also added a similar
mingw32-libvirt.spec.in change to patch 06/10 (fornetworkcommon.rng).