On 04/21/2015 10:34 AM, Laine Stump wrote:
On 04/21/2015 09:48 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 16.04.2015 21:42, Cole Robinson wrote:
>> If libvirt-daemon-config-network is installed while libvirtd is already
>> running, the daemon needs to be restarted to pick up the change.
>>
>> Instead let's trigger a daemon reload when the package is first installed.
>> Then the default network is available immediately if libvirtd was already
>> running.
>>
>>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867546
>> ---
>> libvirt.spec.in | 8 ++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/libvirt.spec.in b/libvirt.spec.in
>> index e08c9e7..ada0257 100644
>> --- a/libvirt.spec.in
>> +++ b/libvirt.spec.in
>> @@ -1770,6 +1770,14 @@ if test $1 -eq 1 && test ! -f
%{_sysconfdir}/libvirt/qemu/networks/default.xml ;
>> < %{_datadir}/libvirt/networks/default.xml \
>> > %{_sysconfdir}/libvirt/qemu/networks/default.xml
>> ln -s ../default.xml
%{_sysconfdir}/libvirt/qemu/networks/autostart/default.xml
>> +
>> + # Make sure libvirt picks up the new network defininiton
>> + %if %{with_systemd}
>> + /bin/systemctl reload libvirtd.service >/dev/null 2>&1 ||:
>> + %else
>> + /sbin/service libvirtd reload > /dev/null 2>&1 || :
>> + %endif
>> +
>> fi
>> %endif
>>
>>
> There's already a 'systemctl try-restart libvirtd.service' call just a
> few lines below. They were added in 4789fb2e. I think we can use them -
> also, I'm not sure why it doesn't work since we are restarting daemon
> even now (without this patch).
I think the issue may be that the default network is in a different
sub-package than libvirtd, so libvirtd is already started/restart by the
time the file is installed. Or something like that. I do recall that
this is a real problem though.
Heh. And if I had taken the time to go read the BZ that Cole referenced
in his commit log message, I would have seen that I came to that same
conclusion all the way back in 2012 :-/ It's amazing just how much I
forget...
So I think this patch will be okay if we can just verify that it doesn't
experience the same problem that I experienced when performing the
reload manually. (Or, what about the idea I posted in the BZ about
checking if libvirtd is running, and sending the file to "virsh
net-define" instead of copying it when that's the case?)