27 Oct
2017
27 Oct
'17
9:47 a.m.
On 10/27/2017 03:31 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Fri, 27 Oct 2017 14:42:57 +0200 Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> wrote:
Yes, we should also replace that with
return s390_has_feat(S390_FEAT_GUARDED_STORAGE)
I can fixup my patch or provide a 2nd one.
Consider a fixed up patch acked by me.
+1 You can keep my ack too. I will try to find some time and read the v2 though.