On 10/27/2017 03:31 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Fri, 27 Oct 2017 14:42:57 +0200
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger(a)de.ibm.com> wrote:
> Yes, we should also replace that with
>
> return s390_has_feat(S390_FEAT_GUARDED_STORAGE)
>
> I can fixup my patch or provide a 2nd one.
>
Consider a fixed up patch acked by me.
+1 You can keep my ack too. I will try to find some time and read
the v2 though.