On Mon, 2019-01-28 at 10:36 +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 11:24:38AM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> Should this be a <channel> at all?
>
> We generally use <serial> for native emulated devices such as
> isa-serial, which isa-debugcon seems very closely related to...
<channel> is aiming to expose application specific guest data channels.
<serial> is aiming to expose general purpose guest data channels.
To me isa-debugcon is an application specific data channels, so
<channel> feels a better fit.
Maybe I have misunderstood what isa-debugcon is, but it looks more
of a general purpose channel in the vein of isa-serial rather than
something application specific like the qemu-guest-agent or SPICE
channels for example.
> Perhaps the best way to hook this up would be
>
> <serial type='pty'>
> <target type='isa-serial'>
IMHO using 'isa-serial' would be misleading for applications which
know about <serial> ports today and may well cause unexpected side
effects, especially wrt to the <console> mapping of the first <serial>
port.
Good point about the <console>/<serial> mapping, which we should
make sure is handled correctly.
--
Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization