On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@redhat.com> wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 05:08:12PM +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
(We already discussed at length why this is needed and we are already doing it for other boolean getters so lets not have the discussion about this need, again).
Actually this was discussed for libosinfo, not libvirt-glib, here is the relevant email for those who were wondering about this discussion:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/virt-tools-list/2011-November/msg00090.html
Ah ok but both libraries are meant to be first-class g* citizens and hence the same need to follow the usual conventions unless there is a compelling reason not to. Also what I said about us already following this convention is not incorrect either, e.g gvir_domain_get_persistent() declared/defined just above this new function. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124