Re: [libvirt] [libvirt-glib] Add gvir_domain_get_saved()
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 05:08:12PM +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
wrote:
> (We already discussed at length why this
> is needed and we are already doing it for other boolean getters so
> lets not have the discussion about this need, again).
Actually this was discussed for libosinfo, not libvirt-glib, here is the
relevant email for those who were wondering about this discussion:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/virt-tools-list/2011-November/msg00090.html
Ah ok but both libraries are meant to be first-class g* citizens and
hence the same need to follow the usual conventions unless there is a
compelling reason not to. Also what I said about us already following
this convention is not incorrect either, e.g
gvir_domain_get_persistent() declared/defined just above this new
function.
--
Regards,
Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
FSF member#5124