On 7/10/23 12:07, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 12:02:35PM +0200, Boris Fiuczynski wrote:
> On 7/5/23 8:20 AM, Boris Fiuczynski wrote:
>> Enable by default asynchronous teardown on S390 hosts and add tests for
>> asynchronous teardown autogeneration support.
>> On S390 hosts, Secure Execution guests can take a long time to shutdown,
>> since the memory cleanup can take a long time. Since there is no
>> practical way to determine whether a S390 guest is running in Secure
>> Execution mode, and since the asynchronous teardown does not impact
>> normal (not Secure Execution) guests or guests without large memory
>> configurations, we enable asynchronous teardown by default on S390.
>> A user can select to override the default in the guest domain XML.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Boris Fiuczynski<fiuczy(a)linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>
> As it turns out the discussion seems to be on this patch only.
> Would it be acceptable to push the first four patches off the series without
> the fifth patch?
Yes, that's fine.
With regards,
Daniel
Merged now.
Michal