On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 5:21 PM Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 04:05:47PM +0800, Han Han wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 2:44 PM Peter Krempa <pkrempa(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 14:08:17 +0800, Han Han wrote:
> > > Let's drop tftp support since it is ususabled before or after QEMU
v2.8
> > > [1].
> > >
> > > [1]:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372143
> > >
> > >
> > > Han Han (3):
> > > docs: Remove tftp protocol support from docs
> > > src: Remove tftp network storage support
> > > news: Remove support for tftp storage protocol
> >
> > NACK series:
> >
> > 1) qemu 2.8 is still supported by libvirt
> >
> However, the tftp is actually unusable for all versions of qemu, while
the
> formatdomain doc
> states that it is optional protocol
Do you have any more information on this. I'd be surprised if it was
/always/ unusuable, as opposed to initially working and then getting
broken in some particular version of QEMU.
I tested on qemu-kvm-1.5.3-174.el7.x86_64 curl-7.29.0-58.el7.x86_64
tftp-server-5.2-22.el7.x86_64, it doesn't work, either:
➜ ~ curl tftp://127.0.0.1/img -o /tmp/tftp
% Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time
Current
Dload Upload Total Spent Left
Speed
100 100M 100 100M 0 0 20.6M 0 0:00:04 0:00:04 --:--:--
20.6M
100 100M 100 100M 0 0 20.6M 0 0:00:04 0:00:04 --:--:--
20.6M
➜ ~ qemu-img create -f qcow2 -b 'json:{"file.driver":"tftp",
"file.url":"tftp://127.0.0.1/img"}'
/var/lib/libvirt/images/tftp.img
Formatting '/var/lib/libvirt/images/tftp.img', fmt=qcow2 size=104857600
backing_file='json:{"file.driver":"tftp",
"file.url":"tftp://127.0.0.1/img"}'
encryption=off cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off
^C
➜ ~ qemu-img info 'json:{"file.driver":"tftp",
"file.url":"tftp://
127.0.0.1/img"}'
^C
The qemu-img command above is stuck and never returns.
Max, is the tftp unusable for all versions of QEMU? Could you please give
more info on that?
>
> > 2) we can't remove XML parser support for previously supported XMLs as
> > the existing defined VMs would vanish. That's exactly why the check in
> > my patch was added into the validator which doesn't validate existing
> > defined configs.
> >
> I understand the consideration of the compatibility. How about only
> removing it from docs?
Regards,
Daniel
--
|:
https://berrange.com -o-
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|:
https://libvirt.org -o-
https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|:
https://entangle-photo.org -o-
https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
--
Best regards,
-----------------------------------
Han Han
Quality Engineer
Redhat.
Email: hhan(a)redhat.com
Phone: +861065339333