Re: [libvirt] [PATCH v2 3/5] virobject: Introduce VIR_CLASS_NEW() macro

So far we are repeating the following lines over and over: if (!(virSomeObjectClass = virClassNew(virClassForObject(), "virSomeObject", sizeof(virSomeObject), virSomeObjectDispose); return -1; While this works, it is impossible to do some checking. Firstly, the class name (the 2nd argument) doesn't match the name in the code in all cases (the 3rd argument). Secondly, the current style is needlessly verbose. This commit turns example into following: VIR_CLASS_NEW(virClassForObject(), virSomeObject); Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn(a)redhat.com&gt;

diff --git a/src/access/viraccessmanager.c b/src/access/viraccessmanager.c index c268ec57f7..a8d361d389 100644 --- a/src/access/viraccessmanager.c +++ b/src/access/viraccessmanager.c @@ -54,11 +54,8 @@ static void virAccessManagerDispose(void *obj); static int virAccessManagerOnceInit(void) { - if (!(virAccessManagerClass = virClassNew(virClassForObjectLockable(), - "virAccessManagerClass", - sizeof(virAccessManager), - virAccessManagerDispose))) - return -1; + VIR_CLASS_NEW(virClassForObjectLockable(), + virAccessManager);