On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 10:24:05AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
On 03/21/2011 02:20 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 08:31:22PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> Well, I tend to prefer having a 0 at the end of character arrays
> in C, this can be useful for example when debugging, so slightly
> preferring one extra byte malloc for safety, either way not a big
> deal, but let's fix this,
I see two ways to do things - either malloc an extra byte (which will
always be NUL from the malloc, so deleting 'virLogBuffer[virLogSize] =
0' is still okay), or by touching the rest of the code to always leave
virLogBuffer[virLogSize-1] as NUL (more invasive, and caps the useful
log to virLogSize-1). Do you want me to prepare a followup patch, and
if so, for which of those two options?
it's really a minor issue, malloc'ing an extra byte sounds fine to me.
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit
http://xmlsoft.org/
daniel(a)veillard.com | Rpmfind RPM search engine
http://rpmfind.net/
http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library
http://libvirt.org/