On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Eric Blake <eblake(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 09/23/2013 09:07 AM, Nehal J Wani wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 4:02 AM, Eric Blake <eblake(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Nehal J. Wani reported on IRC a rather interesting build failure:
>>
>> In file included from util/virnetdevbridge.c:53:0:
>> /usr/include/linux/in6.h:30:8: error: redefinition of 'struct in6_addr'
>> struct in6_addr {
>> ^
>>
>> * Makefile.am (SUBDIRS): Put '.' first, not last.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake(a)redhat.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Tough to argue the build-breaker rule on this one, since a
>> fresh checkout doesn't hit it (only a 'make check' without
>> a 'make', across an incremental build that happened to need
>> new configure substitutions). So I'll wait for a review
>> for my one-liner.
>>
>
>
> Ping. If there is a specific reason why this was not pushed, I would
> like to know.
Pong - no one has reviewed it. Did it work for you? If so, state that,
and your review will serve as enough for me to push it :)
Running 'make' and then 'make check' worked for me. So, I guess there
is no problem in pushing this patch.
--
Nehal J Wani