Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Daniel Veillard wrote:
> But let's separate the 2 issues, apply that patch, and let's try to
> solve
> the way to detect defined domain easilly and properly.
Agreed. Version 3 of the patch has been committed.
Yes, actually, I agree, it seems strange that you have to make two
different calls to get all domains active and inactive. And overloading
the id to indicate inactivity is lame, even though Xen does it. It's
totally reasonable to imagine another virtualization system that
maintained a domain's id across active/inactive cycles.
--Hugh
--
Red Hat Virtualization Group
http://redhat.com/virtualization
Hugh Brock | virt-manager
http://virt-manager.org
hbrock(a)redhat.com | virtualization library
http://libvirt.org