Il 22/08/2013 14:43, Laszlo Ersek ha scritto:
On 08/21/13 19:06, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 21/08/2013 19:07, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
>> NACK
>
> You know that a single developer's NACK counts nothing (it can be you,
> it can be me), don't you?
going meta...
What's this?
All I know (... I think I know) about patch acceptance is that Anthony
prefers to have at least one R-b. As far as I've seen this is not a hard
requirement (for example, maintainers sometimes send unreviewed patches
in a pull request, and on occasion they are merged).
No words have been spent on NAKs yet (... since my subscription, that
is). Is this stuff formalized somewhere?
Sorry for wasting time...
No, it's not. But for example I NACKed removal of pvpanic from 1.6, it
was overridden, and I didn't complain too much.
Paolo