On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 05:58:57PM +0900, Taku Izumi wrote:
When the new maximum memory size becomes less than the current memory size,
I think it is not the libvirt client but the each driver that decides the behavior
(reject the operation or shrink the current memory size).
Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi <izumi.taku(a)jp.fujitsu.com>
---
tools/virsh.c | 10 +---------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)
Index: libvirt/tools/virsh.c
===================================================================
--- libvirt.orig/tools/virsh.c
+++ libvirt/tools/virsh.c
@@ -3030,15 +3030,7 @@ cmdSetmaxmem(vshControl *ctl, const vshC
if (virDomainSetMaxMemory(dom, kilobytes) != 0) {
vshError(ctl, "%s", _("Unable to change MaxMemorySize"));
- virDomainFree(dom);
- return FALSE;
- }
-
- if (kilobytes < info.memory) {
- if (virDomainSetMemory(dom, kilobytes) != 0) {
- vshError(ctl, "%s", _("Unable to shrink current
MemorySize"));
- ret = FALSE;
- }
+ ret = FALSE;
}
virDomainFree(dom);
ACK
Daniel
--
|:
http://berrange.com -o-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|:
http://entangle-photo.org -o-
http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|