On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 10:57:53AM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
When the daemons were split out from the monolithic libvirtd, the
network driver didn't implement "inhibit idle timeout if there are any
active objects" as was done for other drivers, so virtnetworkd would
always exit after 120 seconds of no incoming connections. This didn't
every cause any visible problem, although it did mean that anytime a
network API was called after an idle time > 120 seconds, that the
restarting virtnetworkd would flush and reload all the
iptables/nftables rules for any active networks.
This patch replicates what is done in the QEMU driver - an nactive is
added to the network driver object, along with an inhibitCallback; the
latter is passed into networkStateInitialize when the driver is
loaded, and the former is incremented for each already-active network,
then incremented/decremented each time a network is started or
stopped. If nactive transitions from 0 to 1 or 1 to 0, inhibitCallback
is called, and it "does the right stuff" to prevent/enable the idle
timeout.
Signed-off-by: Laine Stump <laine(a)redhat.com>
---
I had made this patch as a part of a larger series that will require
it, but haven't sent that yet and keep being annoyed when virtnetworkd
exits out from under a gdb session, so I decided it has enough general
usefulness to send by itself.
Keep in mind that it still needs to successfully survive the restart
without changing anything even once this is merged.
src/network/bridge_driver.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
src/network/bridge_driver_conf.h | 9 ++++++++-
2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/network/bridge_driver.c b/src/network/bridge_driver.c
index 74ba59b4e9..6a48516fdf 100644
--- a/src/network/bridge_driver.c
+++ b/src/network/bridge_driver.c
@@ -2500,6 +2510,10 @@ networkShutdownNetwork(virNetworkDriverState *driver,
VIR_HOOK_SUBOP_END);
virNetworkObjSetActive(obj, false);
+
+ if (!!g_atomic_int_dec_and_test(&driver->nactive) &&
driver->inhibitCallback)
pointless "!!", you're not doing any arithmetic with it
Reviewed-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan(a)redhat.com>