In the function at one place we check if def->cpu is NULL prior
to accessing def->cpu->ncells. Then, later in the code,
def->cpu->ncells is accessed directly, without the check. This
makes coverity unhappy, because the first check makes it think
def->cpu can be NULL. However, the function is not called if
def->cpu is NULL. Therefore, remove the first check and hopefully
make coverity cheer again.
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn(a)redhat.com>
---
src/qemu/qemu_command.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_command.c b/src/qemu/qemu_command.c
index d470b1b..65864d2 100644
--- a/src/qemu/qemu_command.c
+++ b/src/qemu/qemu_command.c
@@ -6594,7 +6594,7 @@ qemuBuildNumaArgStr(virQEMUDriverConfigPtr cfg,
continue;
}
- if (def->cpu && def->cpu->ncells) {
+ if (def->cpu->ncells) {
/* Fortunately, we allow only guest NUMA nodes to be continuous
* starting from zero. */
pos = def->cpu->ncells - 1;
--
1.8.5.5