On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 10:43:50PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
On 05/11/2012 06:10 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
From: Daniel Walsh<dwalsh@redhat.com>
Some security drivers require special options to be passed to the mount system call. Add a security driver API for handling this data.
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange<berrange@redhat.com> --- @@ -423,3 +422,16 @@ int virSecurityManagerSetImageFDLabel(virSecurityManagerPtr mgr, virSecurityReportError(VIR_ERR_NO_SUPPORT, __FUNCTION__); return -1; } + +char *virSecurityManagerGetMountOptions(virSecurityManagerPtr mgr, + virDomainDefPtr vm) +{ + if (mgr->drv->domainGetSecurityMountOptions) + return mgr->drv->domainGetSecurityMountOptions(mgr, vm); + +/* + I don't think this is an error, these should be optional + virSecurityReportError(VIR_ERR_NO_SUPPORT, __FUNCTION__); +*/
Indentation -- or is my email program distorting it?
This is a genuine whitespace bug. Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|