On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 06:54:55PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:44:57AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 06/21/2010 03:47 PM, Justin Clift wrote:
> > This patch adds a new --details option to the virsh pool-list
> > command, making its output more useful to people who use virsh
> > for significant lengths of time.
> >
> > Addresses BZ # 605543
> >
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=605543
> >
> > + /* Determine the total number of pools to list */
> > + numAllPools = numActivePools + numInactivePools;
> > + if (!numAllPools) {
> > + /* No pools to list, so cleanup and return */
> > + vshPrint(ctl, "%s\n", _("No matching pools to
display"));
> > + return TRUE;
> > + }
>
> This is a change in behavior, even when the user didn't specify
> --details. Might it cause any backward compatibility issues in
> scripting, or are we okay with the change?
Correct, we shouldn't change this behaviour - it'll break apps parsing
the output
FWIW Rich Jones complains that the output as it stands is nigh on
unparseable anyway. Perhaps we should consider that a bug, and fix
it...
--Hugh