On 21/05/13 23:35, Eric Blake wrote:
On 05/21/2013 04:01 AM, Osier Yang wrote:
> The more common habit is to add the comment after the statements.
> ---
> src/nwfilter/nwfilter_dhcpsnoop.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/nwfilter/nwfilter_dhcpsnoop.c b/src/nwfilter/nwfilter_dhcpsnoop.c
> index b9921e5..451c783 100644
> --- a/src/nwfilter/nwfilter_dhcpsnoop.c
> +++ b/src/nwfilter/nwfilter_dhcpsnoop.c
> @@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ virNWFilterSnoopListAdd(virNWFilterSnoopIPLeasePtr plnew,
>
> for (pl = *end; pl && plnew->timeout < pl->timeout;
> pl = pl->prev)
> - /* empty */ ;
> + ; /* empty */
How did you determine which style was more common? Do you have 'git
grep | wc' numbers to back your claim? I guess putting the comment
after makes it easier to avoid false positives in patch 31?
Yes, you are right. :-)
As far I saw when writing the script to exclude the empty statements,
all other comments for an empty statements are after ";"
I did notice a couple of empty while loops in earlier patches (let me
search for them again...)
found it: patch 8/31. Reply coming up there, soon.
ACK to all patches up to 30 where I didn't explicitly reply.
Pushed 1 to 30. Thanks.
Weak ack to this one (I don't care if it goes in, but I also don't mind
if it gets omitted).
I leave this one for more opinion, if there is no more opinion till
tomorrow, will push it.