Hi, Michel From Dan's suggestion, This issue seems related to DomU memory=256M case. http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207241 To avoid this problem, you should set memory=512MB at first. Anyway, we are not checking virsh command on PV-domain/IA64 for RHEL5. I guess you are the first person to check virsh on PV-domain/IA64! Thanks Atsushi SAKAI "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com> wrote:
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 11:19:03AM +0100, Michel Gauthier wrote:
With the RHEL5 RC distribution on our IA64 platform (4 CPUs), when we use virsh to start a paravirtuailzation domain, we've got the following:
virsh # list Id Name State ---------------------------------- 0 Domain-0 running
virsh # create hndom2 Failed to get devices for domain hndom2 error: Failed to create domain from hndom2
virsh # list Id Name State ---------------------------------- 0 Domain-0 running 24 Domain-24 paused
In spite of an error message, a domain named Domain-Id is created instead of the hndom2 domain.
Yeah, that's a bug in libvirt - we failed to tear down the 'still born' domain when something goes wrong during creation.
If the <currentMemory> tag is suppressed from the XML configuration file, all is OK.
Sounds like a bug in Xen ia64 to me - the <currentMemory> is used to set the initial boot RAM, while the <memory> tag is used to set the maximum reservation. If you omit <currentMemory> then both will be set to the same value. It sounds like Xen ia64 is not able to cope with the memory < maxmem situation.
memory=200 maxmem=500
This behaviour appears with the libvirt version 0.1.8 released with the RHEL5 RC, and also with the libvirt version 0.1.10. Are you aware of this problem?
No - we don't do much (any) testing on ia64 due to lack of any suitable hardware for testing, so we pretty much rely on community/vendors to identify ia64 problems.
If you want some complementary infos (xend log), we can send it to you.
See if you can reproduce it with a regular Xen config file using config options like
memory=200 maxmem=500
Which should simlute presece of '<currentMemory>' element. If you can reproduce it there, its a Xen bug.
Regards, Dan. -- |=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston. +1 978 392 2496 -=| |=- Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ -=| |=- Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/ -=| |=- GnuPG: 7D3B9505 F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 -=|
-- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list