On 07/21/2017 12:25 PM, Tomáš Golembiovský wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jul 2017 10:12:38 +0200
Michal Privoznik <mprivozn(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> On 07/20/2017 08:21 PM, Tomáš Golembiovský wrote:
>> The documentation string has to follow the definition of a constant in
>> the enum. Otherwise, the HTML documentation will be generated
>> incorrectly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tomáš Golembiovský <tgolembi(a)redhat.com>
>> ---
>> include/libvirt/libvirt-domain.h | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/libvirt/libvirt-domain.h b/include/libvirt/libvirt-domain.h
>> index 45f939a8c..2f3162d0f 100644
>> --- a/include/libvirt/libvirt-domain.h
>> +++ b/include/libvirt/libvirt-domain.h
>> @@ -583,56 +583,56 @@ typedef virDomainInterfaceStatsStruct
*virDomainInterfaceStatsPtr;
>> * Memory Statistics Tags:
>> */
>> typedef enum {
>> - /* The total amount of data read from swap space (in kB). */
>> VIR_DOMAIN_MEMORY_STAT_SWAP_IN = 0,
>> - /* The total amount of memory written out to swap space (in kB). */
>> + /* The total amount of data read from swap space (in kB). */
>> VIR_DOMAIN_MEMORY_STAT_SWAP_OUT = 1,
>> + /* The total amount of memory written out to swap space (in kB). */
>
> While this fixes generated HTML, it messes up the header file. So if
> somebody is looking directly into header file they might get confused.
> The problem is in our doc generator.
I agree that it's not ideal solution. But since it's already used in the
header, e.g. in virDomainBlockJobType and
virDomainEventShutdownDetailType,
This one actually looks okay. Did you perhaps mean
virConnectDomainEventDiskChangeReason?
I assumed it's acceptable. And the
overall readability is not that bad because the constant+doc pairs are
separated with newline from one another.
Nope. It's not. I've sent a patch that fixes those two places (I've went
through all of our public headers and found just those two though):
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2017-July/msg00871.html
> I recall this being discussed
> somewhere recently (probably on the list?). The proper fix IMO is to fix
> the generator so that it accepts both:
That would be the best solution, but I'm too scared to look at the
generator. That would be a job for somebody else.
Yeah. Our generator is not that great. I wish that we'd switch to
something already out there so that we don't have to maintain our own
generator.
Michal