John Ferlan wrote:
On 09/18/2014 12:50 PM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 10.09.2014 01:40, John Ferlan wrote:
>> Mimic the "Disk" processing for 'rawio', but for a scsi_host
hostdev
>> lun device.
<...snip...>
>> diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_process.c b/src/qemu/qemu_process.c
>> index b1d8a32..3544716 100644
>> --- a/src/qemu/qemu_process.c
>> +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_process.c
>> @@ -3756,6 +3756,7 @@ int qemuProcessStart(virConnectPtr conn,
>> struct qemuProcessHookData hookData;
>> unsigned long cur_balloon;
>> size_t i;
>> + bool rawio_set = false;
>> char *nodeset = NULL;
>> virBitmapPtr nodemask = NULL;
>> unsigned int stop_flags;
>> @@ -4122,13 +4123,15 @@ int qemuProcessStart(virConnectPtr conn,
>> virDomainDeviceDef dev;
>> virDomainDiskDefPtr disk = vm->def->disks[i];
>>
>> - if (vm->def->disks[i]->rawio == 1)
>> + if (vm->def->disks[i]->rawio == 1) {
>> #ifdef CAP_SYS_RAWIO
>> virCommandAllowCap(cmd, CAP_SYS_RAWIO);
>> #else
>> virReportError(VIR_ERR_CONFIG_UNSUPPORTED, "%s",
>> _("Raw I/O is not supported on this
platform"));
>> #endif
>> + rawio_set = true;
>> + }
>
> Interesting. So if rawio is requested we shout an error but don't fail
> actually. I think we are missing 'goto cleanup' here.
>
See 9a2f36ec04e0436b1ba9f0c21f9be234b25ac579
I can add a goto if desired or perhaps change it to a VIR_WARN() or
something else well.
I've copied the author of that commit to get an opinion...
Hi,
Yes, I guess 'goto cleanup' is missing here indeed. VIR_WARN() will also
work, but probably it'd be better user experience to report an unsupported
configuration and fail early instead of showing a warning that could be
missed.
Roman Bogorodskiy