2017-01-11 17:38 GMT+08:00 Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>:

On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 06:52:45AM +0000, Qiao, Liyong wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I observe that virsh capabilities give wrong cpu topology on a multiple sockets host
>
> taget@jfz1r04h13:~/libvirt$ lscpu
> Architecture:          x86_64
> CPU op-mode(s):        32-bit, 64-bit
> Byte Order:            Little Endian
> CPU(s):                72
> On-line CPU(s) list:   0-71
> Thread(s) per core:    2
> Core(s) per socket:    18
> Socket(s):             2 <------------------------
> NUMA node(s):          2
> Vendor ID:             GenuineIntel
> CPU family:            6
> Model:                 63
> Model name:            Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz
> Stepping:              2
> CPU MHz:               1201.660
> CPU max MHz:           3600.0000
> CPU min MHz:           1200.0000
> BogoMIPS:              4590.78
> Virtualization:        VT-x
> L1d cache:             32K
> L1i cache:             32K
> L2 cache:              256K
> L3 cache:              46080K
> NUMA node0 CPU(s):     0-17,36-53
> NUMA node1 CPU(s):     18-35,54-71
>
> But output of virsh capabilities only gives.
>
> <topology sockets='1' cores='18' threads='2'/>

The 'sockets' value is basically "sockets-per-NUMA-node".

>
> looking into code and got this:
> https://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=blob;f=src/util/virhostcpu.c;h=f29f3122acee018b9fd7dca06fd7ae1fc118b210;hb=HEAD#l703
>
> should we change it into
>
> 704<https://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=blob;f=src/util/virhostcpu.c;h=f29f3122acee018b9fd7dca06fd7ae1fc118b210;hb=HEAD#l704>             *sockets  += nodesockets;
>
>
> This also affect nodeinfo.sockets.

BOth the <topology> summary and nodeinfo data is really a broken
design as it can't cope with asymetric topologies. We recommend
apps to completely ignore this data, and instead look at the fine
grained topology info in the capabilities:

    <topology>
      <cells num='2'>
        <cell id='0'>
          ...
          <cpus num='6'>
            <cpu id='0' socket_id='0' core_id='0' siblings='0'/>
            <cpu id='1' socket_id='0' core_id='2' siblings='1'/>
            <cpu id='2' socket_id='0' core_id='4' siblings='2'/>
            <cpu id='6' socket_id='0' core_id='1' siblings='6'/>
            <cpu id='7' socket_id='0' core_id='3' siblings='7'/>
            <cpu id='8' socket_id='0' core_id='5' siblings='8'/>
          </cpus>
        </cell>
        ...
      </cells>
    </topology>

Regards,
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-    http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list