Re: [libvirt] <bootloader /> BUG
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 01:33:34AM +0200, Stefan de Konink wrote:
With the tip of DanB I am currently using the inactive XML storage
quite
satisfied with the concept of first undefining than starting. But there
is still a bug.
The inactive XML adds a <bootloader /> tag. Now that is (in my
perspective) not a bug, but it it is that libvirt expects a config. In
my personal believes the tag shouldn't be there if there is no config;
or libvirt should not
I think is similar to what I reported in February:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2008-February/msg00097.html
There's a patch attached that works around the issue but I doubt it
still applies.
Cheers,
-- Guido