Daniel,
but for remote access we sould try to get at least the remote support compiling.
Remote access is all I need.
But you can't held us responsible for the fact you use a given platform for your libvirt developments.
I absolutely do not. I am sorry if I came off as snippy or ungrateful. I know how hard you guys work (I'm inundated with patch notices every time I join the list. :) It is simply the frustration of my own job's requirements showing through. Again, no harm intended. -- -a "Ideally, a code library must be immediately usable by naive developers, easily customized by more sophisticated developers, and readily extensible by experts." -- L. Stein On May 7, 2009, at 4:20 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 03:20:23PM -0500, Schley Andrew Kutz wrote:
Anyone? :( I really don't want to have to bring up a whole new box just do do dev work that I should be able to do from my Mac. I guess I can write against the Java bindings locally and then debug remotely on a Linux server.
Well, not that many people seems interested in porting to OS-X, partly I guess because there is no support there for KVM or Xen. I don't know what hypervisor could be used there, but for remote access we sould try to get at least the remote support compiling.
W.r.t. the "new box" send me a Mac OS-X one an I may verify compile errors here, if not, well someone else will have to send portability patches ! If they are clean and don't break other arches I will be happy to push them ! But you can't held us responsible for the fact you use a given platform for your libvirt developments. You "should be able to do from my Mac" if "someone" made the little effort of providing patches and checking, it's open source, it's free after all, right ?
Daniel
-- Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ daniel@veillard.com | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/