On 19. 3. 2020 17:43, Peter Krempa wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 17:22:37 +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> In one of my previous commits I've introduced code that creates
> all devices for given (possible) multipath target. But I've made
> a mistake there - the code accesses src->path without checking if
> the disk source is local. Note that the path is NULL if the
> source is not local.
Well next->path 'may' be NULL if it's not local, but in this case it is
local because NVMe disks are local, but they don't have the path.
Local as in virStorageSourceIsLocalStorage() == true. And for NVMe we
return false exactly because src->path has to be NULL (it can't be set
to any meaningfull path).
How about this formulation:
Note that the path is NULL if the
source is not local as viewed by
virStorageSourceIsLocalStorage().
>
> Fixes: a30078cb832646177defd256e77c632905f1e6d0
> Resolves:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814947
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn(a)redhat.com>
> ---
> src/qemu/qemu_domain.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Once the commit message makes sense:
Reviewed-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa(a)redhat.com>
>
> diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c b/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c
> index 0e2252f6cf..ef17829235 100644
> --- a/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c
> +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c
> @@ -15862,19 +15862,19 @@ qemuDomainNamespaceSetupDisk(virDomainObjPtr vm,
> }
>
> tmpPath = g_strdup(next->path);
> +
> + if (virDevMapperGetTargets(next->path, &targetPaths) < 0
&&
> + errno != ENOSYS && errno != EBADF) {
> + virReportSystemError(errno,
> + _("Unable to get devmapper targets for
%s"),
> + next->path);
> + return -1;
> + }
> }
>
> if (virStringListAdd(&paths, tmpPath) < 0)
> return -1;
>
> - if (virDevMapperGetTargets(next->path, &targetPaths) < 0
&&
> - errno != ENOSYS && errno != EBADF) {
> - virReportSystemError(errno,
> - _("Unable to get devmapper targets for
%s"),
> - next->path);
> - return -1;
> - }
> -
> if (virStringListMerge(&paths, &targetPaths) < 0)
> return -1;
Is this supposed to go after 'tmpPath' in the list? Otherwise you might
want to move it toghether with the call to virDevMapperGetTargets.
Good point, the order doesn't matter.
Michal