Hi Peter,
Thanks a lot for your review! I'm so sorry for the delay, please see my reply below.
在 2018/6/8 16:05, Peter Krempa 写道:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 15:09:58 +0800, Weilun Zhu wrote:
> As qemuMonitorJSONIOProcess() will unlock the qemu monitor, there is
> some extreme situation, eg qemu send message to monitor twice in a short
> time, where the local viriable 'msg' of qemuMonitorIOProcess() could be
I'd write this as:
As qemuMonitorJSONIOProcess will call qemuMonitorJSONIOProcessEvent
which unlocks the monitor mutex
All right, it's much better.
> a wild point:
>
> 1. qemuMonitorSend() assign mon->msg to parameter 'msg', which is alse a
> local variable of its caller qemuMonitorJSONCommandWithFd(), cause
> eventloop to send message to monitor, then wait condition.
> 2. qemu send message to monitor for the first time immediately.
> 3. qemuMonitorIOProcess() is called, then wake up the qemuMonitorSend()
> thread, but the qemuMonitorSend() thread stuck for a while as cpu pressure
> or some other reasons,, which means the qemu monitor is still unlocked.
> 4. qemu send event message to monitor for the second time,
> such as RTC_CHANGE event
> 5. qemuMonitorIOProcess() is called, the local viriable 'msg' is
> assigned to mon->msg.
> 6. qemuMonitorIOProcess() call qemuMonitorJSONIOProcess() to deal with
> the qemu event.
> 7. qemuMonitorJSONIOProcess() unlock the qemu monitor in the macro
> 'QEMU_MONITOR_CALLBACK', then qemuMonitorSend() thread get the mutex
> and free the mon->msg, assign mon->msg to NULL.
This is okay
>
> so the local viriable 'msg' of qemuMonitorIOProcess() is a wild pointer
> now.
>
> AFAIK, it is not harmful to call again virCondBroadcast() while msg is a
> wild pointer, but just in case, we fix it in this patch.
These two paragraphs can be dropped.
Also we now require that the authors of patches agree to the
'Developer's certificate of origin' (
https://developercertificate.org/
). You express your agreement by adding a 'Signed-off-by' line. Without
that, your patch can't be pushed.
OK, I did not notice that, I will add it.
> ---
> src/qemu/qemu_monitor.c | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_monitor.c b/src/qemu/qemu_monitor.c
> index 215135aa3e..a4b8572e24 100644
> --- a/src/qemu/qemu_monitor.c
> +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_monitor.c
> @@ -463,6 +463,14 @@ qemuMonitorIOProcess(qemuMonitorPtr mon)
> #if DEBUG_IO
> VIR_DEBUG("Process done %d used %d", (int)mon->bufferOffset, len);
> #endif
> +
> + /* As the monitor mutex was unlocked in qemuMonitorJSONIOProcess()
> + * while dealing with qemu event, mon->msg could be changed,
> + * thus we re-acquire the msg here */
> + msg = NULL;
This part is okay (except for the last line if you apply what I suggest
bellow)
> + if (mon->msg && mon->msg->txOffset == mon->msg->txLength)
{
> + msg = mon->msg;
But this condition can be merged with the one below.
> +
> if (msg && msg->finished)
It should look like:
if (mon->msg && mon->msg->finished)
virCondBroadcast(&mon->notify);
The part with the txOffset is not necessary any more, since
msg->finished will be set only when that was true. The main reasoning is
that we don't really need to extract msg at this point any more.
OK, your suggest is better, and I will change the comment like following:
"
- if (msg && msg->finished)
+
+ /* As the monitor mutex was unlocked in qemuMonitorJSONIOProcess()
+ * while dealing with qemu event, mon->msg could be changed which
+ * means the above 'msg' may be invalid, thus we use 'mon->msg'
here */
+ if (mon->msg && mon->msg->finished)
"
> virCondBroadcast(&mon->notify);
> return len;
> --
> 2.18.0.rc1
>
> --
> libvir-list mailing list
> libvir-list(a)redhat.com
>
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list