On Mon, 2019-05-20 at 15:03 +0200, Ján Tomko wrote:
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 01:37:51PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> Now that we can safely iterate over devices that don't have
> an associated virDomainDeviceInfo, supporting IOMMU devices
> is no longer a problem.
Actually, not having a DeviceInfo for the IOMMU device might be a bug
here. I omitted it because there's no address to be specified, but
there might be a use for an alias here.
What would be the point of having an alias for IOMMU devices, when
there can only be one per guest?
--
Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization