Thanks Eric.
I'd like to know if this issue will be resolved in later release of
RHEL (e.g., RHEL 6.3), if yes, I think I can wait.
Regards,
Qian
[please don't top-post on technical lists]
On 04/15/2012 03:30 AM, Qian Zhang wrote:
> I think what happened to me is
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757382 which is a dead
> lock issue between libvirtd process and its child process.
> It looks this issue has been fixed for Fedora 16, any plan for RHEL 6.2?
If you'd like this to be backported to RHEL 6.2, perhaps the best thing
to do is to open a support ticket to Red Hat specifically requesting
that this Fedora BZ be cloned to RHEL.
--
Eric Blake eblake(a)redhat.com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library
http://libvirt.org