18 Aug
2012
18 Aug
'12
2:24 p.m.
On 08/18/2012 12:38 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
Not complete, but this is what I got done in a couple hours after complaining about Osier's series: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2012-August/msg01247.html
I hadn't noticed that virsh.c was split up like that either, but definitely I agree. Although I earlier begrudgingly went along with having the virsh-edit.c template #included by virsh.c (simply because it was better than what it was replacing), in general #including .c files is a very gross and misleading hack that should be avoided.