On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 03:02:12PM +0800, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 11:19 PM, Adam Litke <agl(a)us.ibm.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 09:45:11PM +0800, Lei HH Li wrote:
> >
> > Summary here.
> >
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >> ---
> >> src/qemu/qemu_command.c | 35 ++++++++++++++
> >> src/qemu/qemu_driver.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++
> >> src/qemu/qemu_migration.c | 16 +++---
> >> src/qemu/qemu_monitor.c | 19 +++++++
> >> src/qemu/qemu_monitor.h | 6 ++
> >> src/qemu/qemu_monitor_json.c | 107
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> src/qemu/qemu_monitor_json.h | 6 ++
> >> src/qemu/qemu_monitor_text.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> src/qemu/qemu_monitor_text.h | 6 ++
> >> 9 files changed, 302 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_command.c b/src/qemu/qemu_command.c
> >> index cf99f89..c4d2938 100644
> >> --- a/src/qemu/qemu_command.c
> >> +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_command.c
> >> @@ -1728,6 +1728,41 @@ qemuBuildDriveStr(virDomainDiskDefPtr disk,
> >> }
> >> }
> >>
> >> + /*block I/O throttling*/
> >> + if (disk->blkiothrottle.bps || disk->blkiothrottle.bps_rd
> >> + || disk->blkiothrottle.bps_wr || disk->blkiothrottle.iops
> >> + || disk->blkiothrottle.iops_rd ||
disk->blkiothrottle.iops_wr) {
> >
> > The above suggests that you should dynamically allocate the blkiothrottle
> > struct. Then you could reduce this check to:
> If the structure is dynamically allocated, it will be easy to leak
> memory although the checking is reduced.
Not using dynamic allocation because it is harder to do correctly is probably
not the best reasoning. There is a virDomainDiskDefFree() function to help free
dynamic memory in the disk definition. Anyway, there are also other ways to
clean this up. For example, you could add another field to disk->blkiothrottle
(.enabled?) to indicate whether throttling is active. Then you only have one
Goot
idea.
variable to check. For the record, I still prefer using a pointer
to
blkiothrottle for this.
I only express my opinion.:) I prefer using the structure
with
.enabled, not pointer. But the final implemetation depends on you and
Li Lei.
> >
> > if (disk->blkiothrottle) {
> >
> >> + if (disk->blkiothrottle.bps) {
> >> + virBufferAsprintf(&opt, ",bps=%llu",
> >> + disk->blkiothrottle.bps);
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + if (disk->blkiothrottle.bps_rd) {
> >> + virBufferAsprintf(&opt, ",bps_wr=%llu",
> >> + disk->blkiothrottle.bps_rd);
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + if (disk->blkiothrottle.bps_wr) {
> >> + virBufferAsprintf(&opt, ",bps_wr=%llu",
> >> + disk->blkiothrottle.bps_wr);
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + if (disk->blkiothrottle.iops) {
> >> + virBufferAsprintf(&opt, ",iops=%llu",
> >> + disk->blkiothrottle.iops);
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + if (disk->blkiothrottle.iops_rd) {
> >> + virBufferAsprintf(&opt, ",iops_rd=%llu",
> >> + disk->blkiothrottle.iops_rd);
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + if (disk->blkiothrottle.iops_wr) {
> >> + virBufferAsprintf(&opt, ",iops_wr=%llu",
> >> + disk->blkiothrottle.iops_wr);
> >> + }
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> if (virBufferError(&opt)) {
> >> virReportOOMError();
> >> goto error;
> >> diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c b/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c
> >> index 5588d93..bbee9a3 100644
> >> --- a/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c
> >> +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c
> >> @@ -10449,6 +10449,59 @@ qemuDomainBlockPull(virDomainPtr dom, const char
*path, unsigned long bandwidth,
> >> return ret;
> >> }
> >>
> >> +static int
> >> +qemuDomainBlockIoThrottle(virDomainPtr dom,
> >> + const char *disk,
> >> + virDomainBlockIoThrottleInfoPtr info,
> >> + virDomainBlockIoThrottleInfoPtr reply,
> >> + unsigned int flags)
> >> +{
> >> + struct qemud_driver *driver = dom->conn->privateData;
> >> + virDomainObjPtr vm = NULL;
> >> + qemuDomainObjPrivatePtr priv;
> >> + char uuidstr[VIR_UUID_STRING_BUFLEN];
> >> + const char *device = NULL;
> >> + int ret = -1;
> >> +
> >> + qemuDriverLock(driver);
> >> + virUUIDFormat(dom->uuid, uuidstr);
> >> + vm = virDomainFindByUUID(&driver->domains, dom->uuid);
> >> + if (!vm) {
> >> + qemuReportError(VIR_ERR_NO_DOMAIN,
> >> + _("no domain with matching uuid
'%s'"), uuidstr);
> >> + goto cleanup;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + if (!virDomainObjIsActive(vm)) {
> >> + qemuReportError(VIR_ERR_OPERATION_INVALID,
> >> + "%s", _("domain is not
running"));
> >> + goto cleanup;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + device = qemuDiskPathToAlias(vm, disk);
> >> + if (!device) {
> >> + goto cleanup;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + if (qemuDomainObjBeginJobWithDriver(driver, vm, QEMU_JOB_MODIFY) <
0)
> >> + goto cleanup;
> >> + qemuDomainObjEnterMonitorWithDriver(driver, vm);
> >> + priv = vm->privateData;
> >> + ret = qemuMonitorBlockIoThrottle(priv->mon, device, info, reply,
flags);
> >> + qemuDomainObjExitMonitorWithDriver(driver, vm);
> >> + if (qemuDomainObjEndJob(driver, vm) == 0) {
> >> + vm = NULL;
> >> + goto cleanup;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> +cleanup:
> >> + VIR_FREE(device);
> >> + if (vm)
> >> + virDomainObjUnlock(vm);
> >> + qemuDriverUnlock(driver);
> >> + return ret;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> static virDriver qemuDriver = {
> >> .no = VIR_DRV_QEMU,
> >> .name = "QEMU",
> >> @@ -10589,6 +10642,7 @@ static virDriver qemuDriver = {
> >> .domainGetBlockJobInfo = qemuDomainGetBlockJobInfo, /* 0.9.4 */
> >> .domainBlockJobSetSpeed = qemuDomainBlockJobSetSpeed, /* 0.9.4 */
> >> .domainBlockPull = qemuDomainBlockPull, /* 0.9.4 */
> >> + .domainBlockIoThrottle = qemuDomainBlockIoThrottle, /* 0.9.4 */
> >> };
> >>
> >>
> >> diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_migration.c b/src/qemu/qemu_migration.c
> >> index 4516231..b932ef5 100644
> >> --- a/src/qemu/qemu_migration.c
> >> +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_migration.c
> >> @@ -1394,9 +1394,9 @@ struct _qemuMigrationSpec {
> >>
> >> #define TUNNEL_SEND_BUF_SIZE 65536
> >>
> >> -typedef struct _qemuMigrationIOThread qemuMigrationIOThread;
> >> -typedef qemuMigrationIOThread *qemuMigrationIOThreadPtr;
> >> -struct _qemuMigrationIOThread {
> >> +typedef struct _qemuMigrationIoThread qemuMigrationIoThread;
> >> +typedef qemuMigrationIoThread *qemuMigrationIoThreadPtr;
> >> +struct _qemuMigrationIoThread {
> >> virThread thread;
> >> virStreamPtr st;
> >> int sock;
> >
> > Why the above name change? It seems a bit superfluous and it's causing a
lot of
> > unnecessary noise in this patch.
> Yeah, it is unrelative.
> >
> >> @@ -1405,7 +1405,7 @@ struct _qemuMigrationIOThread {
> >>
> >> static void qemuMigrationIOFunc(void *arg)
> >> {
> >> - qemuMigrationIOThreadPtr data = arg;
> >> + qemuMigrationIoThreadPtr data = arg;
> >> char *buffer;
> >> int nbytes = TUNNEL_SEND_BUF_SIZE;
> >>
> >> @@ -1447,11 +1447,11 @@ error:
> >> }
> >>
> >>
> >> -static qemuMigrationIOThreadPtr
> >> +static qemuMigrationIoThreadPtr
> >> qemuMigrationStartTunnel(virStreamPtr st,
> >> int sock)
> >> {
> >> - qemuMigrationIOThreadPtr io;
> >> + qemuMigrationIoThreadPtr io;
> >>
> >> if (VIR_ALLOC(io) < 0) {
> >> virReportOOMError();
> >> @@ -1474,7 +1474,7 @@ qemuMigrationStartTunnel(virStreamPtr st,
> >> }
> >>
> >> static int
> >> -qemuMigrationStopTunnel(qemuMigrationIOThreadPtr io)
> >> +qemuMigrationStopTunnel(qemuMigrationIoThreadPtr io)
> >> {
> >> int rv = -1;
> >> virThreadJoin(&io->thread);
> >> @@ -1508,7 +1508,7 @@ qemuMigrationRun(struct qemud_driver *driver,
> >> unsigned int migrate_flags = QEMU_MONITOR_MIGRATE_BACKGROUND;
> >> qemuDomainObjPrivatePtr priv = vm->privateData;
> >> qemuMigrationCookiePtr mig = NULL;
> >> - qemuMigrationIOThreadPtr iothread = NULL;
> >> + qemuMigrationIoThreadPtr iothread = NULL;
> >> int fd = -1;
> >> unsigned long migrate_speed = resource ? resource :
priv->migMaxBandwidth;
> >>
> >> diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_monitor.c b/src/qemu/qemu_monitor.c
> >> index c9dd69e..8995517 100644
> >> --- a/src/qemu/qemu_monitor.c
> >> +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_monitor.c
> >> @@ -2581,6 +2581,25 @@ int qemuMonitorBlockJob(qemuMonitorPtr mon,
> >> return ret;
> >> }
> >>
> >> +int qemuMonitorBlockIoThrottle(qemuMonitorPtr mon,
> >> + const char *device,
> >> + virDomainBlockIoThrottleInfoPtr info,
> >> + virDomainBlockIoThrottleInfoPtr reply,
> >> + unsigned int flags)
> >> +{
> >> + int ret;
> >> +
> >> + VIR_DEBUG("mon=%p, device=%p, info=%p, reply=%p, flags=%x",
> >> + mon, device, info, reply, flags);
> >> +
> >> + if (mon->json) {
> >> + ret = qemuMonitorJSONBlockIoThrottle(mon, device, info, reply,
flags);
> >> + } else {
> >> + ret = qemuMonitorTextBlockIoThrottle(mon, device, info, reply,
flags);
> >> + }
> >> + return ret;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> int qemuMonitorVMStatusToPausedReason(const char *status)
> >> {
> >> int st;
> >> diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_monitor.h b/src/qemu/qemu_monitor.h
> >> index 3ec78ad..b897a66 100644
> >> --- a/src/qemu/qemu_monitor.h
> >> +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_monitor.h
> >> @@ -516,6 +516,12 @@ int qemuMonitorBlockJob(qemuMonitorPtr mon,
> >> virDomainBlockJobInfoPtr info,
> >> int mode);
> >>
> >> +int qemuMonitorBlockIoThrottle(qemuMonitorPtr mon,
> >> + const char *device,
> >> + virDomainBlockIoThrottleInfoPtr info,
> >> + virDomainBlockIoThrottleInfoPtr reply,
> >> + unsigned int flags);
> >> +
> >> /**
> >> * When running two dd process and using <> redirection, we need a
> >> * shell that will not truncate files. These two strings serve that
> >> diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_monitor_json.c b/src/qemu/qemu_monitor_json.c
> >> index 3d383c8..4c49baf 100644
> >> --- a/src/qemu/qemu_monitor_json.c
> >> +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_monitor_json.c
> >> @@ -3242,3 +3242,110 @@ int qemuMonitorJSONBlockJob(qemuMonitorPtr mon,
> >> virJSONValueFree(reply);
> >> return ret;
> >> }
> >> +
> >> +static int
> >> +qemuMonitorJSONBlockIoThrottleInfo(virJSONValuePtr result,
> >> + virDomainBlockIoThrottleInfoPtr reply)
> >> +{
> >> + virJSONValuePtr io_throttle;
> >> +
> >> + io_throttle = virJSONValueObjectGet(result, "return");
> >> + if (!io_throttle || io_throttle->type != VIR_JSON_TYPE_OBJECT) {
> >> + qemuReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR, "%s",
> >> + _("block_set_io_throttle reply was missing
device address"));
> >> + return -1;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + if (virJSONValueObjectGetNumberUlong(io_throttle, "bps",
&reply->bps) < 0) {
> >> + qemuReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR, "%s",
> >> + _("block_set_io_throttle reply was missing
total throughput limit"));
> >> + return -1;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + if (virJSONValueObjectGetNumberUlong(io_throttle, "bps_rd",
&reply->bps_rd) < 0) {
> >> + qemuReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR, "%s",
> >> + _("block_set_io_throttle reply was missing
read throughput limit"));
> >> + return -1;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + if (virJSONValueObjectGetNumberUlong(io_throttle, "bps_wr",
&reply->bps_wr) < 0) {
> >> + qemuReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR, "%s",
> >> + _("block_set_io_throttle reply was missing
write throughput limit"));
> >> + return -1;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + if (virJSONValueObjectGetNumberUlong(io_throttle, "iops",
&reply->iops) < 0) {
> >> + qemuReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR, "%s",
> >> + _("block_set_io_throttle reply was missing
total operations limit"));
> >> + return -1;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + if (virJSONValueObjectGetNumberUlong(io_throttle, "iops_rd",
&reply->iops_rd) < 0) {
> >> + qemuReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR, "%s",
> >> + _("block_set_io_throttle reply was missing
read operations limit"));
> >> + return -1;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + if (virJSONValueObjectGetNumberUlong(io_throttle, "iops_wr",
&reply->iops_wr) < 0) {
> >> + qemuReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR, "%s",
> >> + _("block_set_io_throttle reply was missing
write operations limit"));
> >> + return -1;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + return 0;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +int qemuMonitorJSONBlockIoThrottle(qemuMonitorPtr mon,
> >> + const char *device,
> >> + virDomainBlockIoThrottleInfoPtr info,
> >> + virDomainBlockIoThrottleInfoPtr reply,
> >> + unsigned int flags)
> >> +{
> >> + int ret = -1;
> >> + virJSONValuePtr cmd = NULL;
> >> + virJSONValuePtr result = NULL;
> >> +
> >> + if (flags) {
> >> + cmd =
qemuMonitorJSONMakeCommand("block_set_io_throttle",
> >> + "s:device", device,
> >> + "U:bps", info->bps,
> >> + "U:bps_rd",
info->bps_rd,
> >> + "U:bps_wr",
info->bps_wr,
> >> + "U:iops",
info->iops,
> >> + "U:iops_rd",
info->iops_rd,
> >> + "U:iops_wr",
info->iops_wr,
> >> + NULL);
> >
> > What happens if the user did not specify values for all of the fields in info?
> >
> >> + } else {
> >> + /*
> >> + cmd = qemuMonitorJSONMakeCommand("query_block",
> >> + "s:device", device,
> >> + NULL);
> >> + */
> >
> > Hmm, what code do you actually want here? If this is a TODO for this RFC,
> Yeah, it is.
> > please include a comment explaining this.
> >
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + if (!cmd)
> >> + return -1;
> >> +
> >> + ret = qemuMonitorJSONCommand(mon, cmd, &result);
> >> +
> >> + if (ret == 0 && virJSONValueObjectHasKey(result,
"error")) {
> >> + if (qemuMonitorJSONHasError(result, "DeviceNotActive"))
> >> + qemuReportError(VIR_ERR_OPERATION_INVALID,
> >> + _("No active operation on device: %s"), device);
> >> + else if (qemuMonitorJSONHasError(result,
"NotSupported"))
> >> + qemuReportError(VIR_ERR_OPERATION_INVALID,
> >> + _("Operation is not supported for device: %s"),
device);
> >> + else
> >> + qemuReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR, "%s",
> >> + _("Unexpected error"));
> >> + ret = -1;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + if (ret == 0 && !flags)
> >> + ret = qemuMonitorJSONBlockIoThrottleInfo(result, reply);
> >> +
> >> + virJSONValueFree(cmd);
> >> + virJSONValueFree(result);
> >> + return ret;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_monitor_json.h b/src/qemu/qemu_monitor_json.h
> >> index a638b41..f146a49 100644
> >> --- a/src/qemu/qemu_monitor_json.h
> >> +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_monitor_json.h
> >> @@ -250,4 +250,10 @@ int qemuMonitorJSONSetLink(qemuMonitorPtr mon,
> >> const char *name,
> >> enum virDomainNetInterfaceLinkState state);
> >>
> >> +int qemuMonitorJSONBlockIoThrottle(qemuMonitorPtr mon,
> >> + const char *device,
> >> + virDomainBlockIoThrottleInfoPtr info,
> >> + virDomainBlockIoThrottleInfoPtr reply,
> >> + unsigned int flags);
> >> +
> >> #endif /* QEMU_MONITOR_JSON_H */
> >> diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_monitor_text.c b/src/qemu/qemu_monitor_text.c
> >> index 51e8c5c..0d4632e 100644
> >> --- a/src/qemu/qemu_monitor_text.c
> >> +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_monitor_text.c
> >> @@ -3396,3 +3396,64 @@ cleanup:
> >> VIR_FREE(reply);
> >> return ret;
> >> }
> >> +
> >> +static int qemuMonitorTextParseBlockIoThrottle(const char *text
ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
> >> + const char *device
ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
> >> +
virDomainBlockIoThrottleInfoPtr reply ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
> >> +{
> >> + int ret = 0;
> >> +
> >> + /* neet to further parse the result*/
> >> +
> >> + if (ret < 0)
> >> + return -1;
> >> +
> >> + return ret;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +int qemuMonitorTextBlockIoThrottle(qemuMonitorPtr mon,
> >> + const char *device,
> >> + virDomainBlockIoThrottleInfoPtr info,
> >> + virDomainBlockIoThrottleInfoPtr reply,
> >> + unsigned int flags)
> >> +{
> >> + char *cmd = NULL;
> >> + char *result = NULL;
> >> + int ret = 0;
> >> +
> >> + if (flags) {
> >> + ret = virAsprintf(&cmd, "block_set_io_throttle %s %llu
%llu %llu %llu %llu %llu",
> >> + device,
> >> + info->bps,
> >> + info->bps_rd,
> >> + info->bps_wr,
> >> + info->iops,
> >> + info->iops_rd,
> >> + info->iops_wr);
> >> + } else {
> >> + /*
> >> + ret = virAsprintf(&cmd, "info block");
> >> + */
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + if (ret < 0) {
> >> + virReportOOMError();
> >> + return -1;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + if (qemuMonitorHMPCommand(mon, cmd, &result) < 0) {
> >> + qemuReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR,
> >> + "%s", _("cannot run monitor
command"));
> >> + ret = -1;
> >> + goto cleanup;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + if (0) {
> >> + ret = qemuMonitorTextParseBlockIoThrottle(result, device, reply);
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> +cleanup:
> >> + VIR_FREE(cmd);
> >> + VIR_FREE(result);
> >> + return ret;
> >> +}
> >> diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_monitor_text.h b/src/qemu/qemu_monitor_text.h
> >> index cc2a252..66a23ac 100644
> >> --- a/src/qemu/qemu_monitor_text.h
> >> +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_monitor_text.h
> >> @@ -243,4 +243,10 @@ int qemuMonitorTextSetLink(qemuMonitorPtr mon,
> >> const char *name,
> >> enum virDomainNetInterfaceLinkState state);
> >>
> >> +int qemuMonitorTextBlockIoThrottle(qemuMonitorPtr mon,
> >> + const char *device,
> >> + virDomainBlockIoThrottleInfoPtr info,
> >> + virDomainBlockIoThrottleInfoPtr reply,
> >> + unsigned int flags);
> >> +
> >> #endif /* QEMU_MONITOR_TEXT_H */
> >> --
> >> 1.7.1
> >>
> >
> > --
> > Adam Litke <agl(a)us.ibm.com>
> > IBM Linux Technology Center
> >
> > --
> > libvir-list mailing list
> > libvir-list(a)redhat.com
> >
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Zhi Yong Wu
>
--
Adam Litke <agl(a)us.ibm.com>
IBM Linux Technology Center