Re: [libvirt] Entering freeze for libvirt-3.5.0
On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 12:21:21PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 01:03:52PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-07-01 at 14:18 +0400, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
> > > qemuxml2argvtest fails consistently in my FreeBSD guest.
> >
> > I guess that's caused by clang inlining functions that are mocked
> > (specifically, some numa related stuff); I think that was discussed
> > several times already. Anyway, it should work fine with '-O0' in
CFLAGS.
>
> Well, would you look at that. It does indeed work flawlessly
> when compiled without optimizations! :O
>
> I'm not sure if that would be considered a reasonable
> compromise to get the test suite running on FreeBSD in the
> context of CI, though. I think it working reliably without
> messing with CFLAGS would be a requirement; others might
> disagree.
Hmm, I thought I fixed that problem when I introduce this patch:
commit 728cacc8abed2b8de39e7b96fa42fde6850ec23a
Author: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange(a)redhat.com>
Date: Fri Apr 7 15:07:49 2017 +0100
annotate all mocked functions with noinline
This made us annotate all mocked functions with noinline, which was
sufficient to make CLang builds pass tests on Ubuntu VMs.
So I did some debugging and this is wierder than I can imagine possible.
I put a printf statement in virNumaGetMaxNode in qemuxml2argvmock.c
to print out the return value.
I also put a printf statement in virNumaNodeIsAvailable in virnuma.c
(in the non-NUMACTL conditional block), that prints out the return
value received from virNumaGetMaxNode
The first printf displays 7, while the second printf displays -1
So we're definitely calling our mock override, but the return
value is getting mangled when seen by the caller, which is a
giant wtf to me.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|