Re: [libvirt] [PATCH v4 2/5] libxl: add support for PVH

On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 04:19:21PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 05:10:30PM +0200, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 03:59:03PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: >>> On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 08:53:15AM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote: >>>> own head) for either of the two modeling approaches >>>> >>>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2018-October/msg00214.html >>>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2018-October/msg00891.html >>> >>> It has a bad name, but essentially you should consider "ostype" to >>> refer to the Hypervisor <-> Guest hardware ABI. >> >> Oh, if that's the case, then indeed separate ostype makes sense. Maybe >> it worth expanding ostype description somewhere in documentation? Also, such definition of os type, make "linux" os type for Xen PV even weirder...