On 08/14/2012 10:47 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 08/14/2012 01:10 AM, Laine Stump wrote:
> @@ -3199,8 +3198,9 @@ networkReleaseActualDevice(virDomainNetDefPtr iface)
> dev->dev, dev->connections);
> }
>
> - ret = 0;
> cleanup:
> + ret = 0;
> +error:
Another case where this might make more sense:
success:
ret = 0;
cleanup:
The cleanups are mechanical, but I'm not sure I like the resulting naming.
Well, I can create a new "error:" label that just does this:
success:
ret = 0;
cleanup:
/* blah blah */
return ret;
error:
goto cleanup;
I do really want an explicit error: label, but also understand why you
don't want a successful exit to go past a label named "error".
respin coming up.