On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 04:52:20PM +0200, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 02:42:22PM +0200, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >>
>> >> But migration still fails
>> >>
>> >
>> > It seems like an unrelated failure. I do not know what's blocking
>> > migration traffic. Could you see if libvirtd.log and qemu logs at source
>> > and destinaiton have clues?
>> >
>>
>> It seems that on VM.log under qemu of desdt host I have:
>> ...
>> -incoming tcp:[::]:49153: Failed to bind socket: Address already in use
>
> Is that port really taken (`ss -ntp` should tell by whom)?
yeah !
It seems gluster uses it on both sides
Since libvirt has been using this port range first, would you open a
bug on gluster to avoid it?
Dan. (prays that Vdsm is not expected to edit libvirt's migration port
range on installation)