On Fri, Jun 08, 2018 at 10:59:58AM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
My own machine has a virtual network on 192.168.123.0/24, and I've been told that it's a common selection for people who create a second network after libvirt's default (and in the past was used as a manual alternative for the default network itself when 192.168.122.0/24
Heh, me too in fact :-)
casued a conflict). Changing to 192.168.97.0/24 also isn't foolproof, but it's much less likely to encounter a conflict leading to a failed test.
Signed-off-by: Laine Stump <laine@laine.org> --- scripts/networks/networkxml2hostout/tck-testnet-3.dat | 4 ++-- scripts/networks/networkxml2hostout/tck-testnet-3.post.dat | 4 ++-- scripts/networks/networkxml2xmlin/tck-testnet-3.xml | 2 +- 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|