28.04.2016 20:45, Maxim Nestratov пишет:
28.04.2016 20:29, Daniel P. Berrange пишет:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 07:57:14PM +0300, Olga Krishtal wrote:
In this proposal description we would like to introduce a separate pool type:fspool. Fspool provides and manages filesystems. Below are listed possible examples of fspool, depending on source type: volume, directory or network. I'm struggling a little to understand what the overal purpose is here. Can you step back a level and describe the overall problem you're facing and what your use cases / goals are for this proposal.
Regards, Daniel
The main purpose of this is to have a generic API to manage filesystems similar to storage API and be able to use these filesystems in domain XMLs defining containers. So ,it is a kind of abstraction of filesystem sources and backends. Also there can be some indirect benefits but they are not the aim.
Maxim
I wonder, if my reply clarify the original message or it's still unclear and it's better to step back more and describe the problem in more details?
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list