On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 11:51:26AM -0500, Dave Allan wrote:
On 03/02/2010 06:46 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>According to David Allan on 3/2/2010 3:13 PM:
>>---
>> tools/virsh.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>>diff --git a/tools/virsh.c b/tools/virsh.c
>>index a6a637d..e52b011 100644
>>--- a/tools/virsh.c
>>+++ b/tools/virsh.c
>>@@ -5221,6 +5221,47 @@ cmdVolDelete(vshControl *ctl, const vshCmd *cmd)
>>
>>
>> /*
>>+ * "vol-zero-out" command
>>+ */
>>+static const vshCmdInfo info_vol_zero_out[] = {
>>+ {"help", gettext_noop("zero out a vol")},
>>+ {"desc", gettext_noop("Ensure further reads from a volume
return
>>zeroes.")},
>
>Unrelated to your patch, but is there any reason we don't use N_() as the
>idiomatic counterpart to _(), rather than spelling out gettext_noop
>everywhere?
>
I assume inertia, but someone else may have a better answer.
Historical accident :-)
Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o-
http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org -o-
http://deltacloud.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|