On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 11:51:26AM -0500, Dave Allan wrote:
On 03/02/2010 06:46 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
According to David Allan on 3/2/2010 3:13 PM:
--- tools/virsh.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/virsh.c b/tools/virsh.c index a6a637d..e52b011 100644 --- a/tools/virsh.c +++ b/tools/virsh.c @@ -5221,6 +5221,47 @@ cmdVolDelete(vshControl *ctl, const vshCmd *cmd)
/* + * "vol-zero-out" command + */ +static const vshCmdInfo info_vol_zero_out[] = { + {"help", gettext_noop("zero out a vol")}, + {"desc", gettext_noop("Ensure further reads from a volume return zeroes.")},
Unrelated to your patch, but is there any reason we don't use N_() as the idiomatic counterpart to _(), rather than spelling out gettext_noop everywhere?
I assume inertia, but someone else may have a better answer.
Historical accident :-) Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://deltacloud.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|