On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 02:32:11PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 03:20:53PM +0200, Ján Tomko wrote:
> I found the reverse order, i.e.
> 'rust PATCH'
> to be both nicer and more useful. (not to mention more common)
>
> For example, in some downstream lists I use a simple text match
> against 'libvirt PATCH', which also catches any subsequent version
I'm not really seeing why it would make any functional difference
to ability to match subjects.
I assume in v2 it would become 'PATCHv2 libvirt', which does not contain
the 'PATCH libvirt' string, unlike 'libvirt PATCHv2' and 'libvirt
PATCH'
Jano