24 Apr
2018
24 Apr
'18
3:05 p.m.
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 02:32:11PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 03:20:53PM +0200, Ján Tomko wrote:
I found the reverse order, i.e. 'rust PATCH' to be both nicer and more useful. (not to mention more common)
For example, in some downstream lists I use a simple text match against 'libvirt PATCH', which also catches any subsequent version
I'm not really seeing why it would make any functional difference to ability to match subjects.
I assume in v2 it would become 'PATCHv2 libvirt', which does not contain the 'PATCH libvirt' string, unlike 'libvirt PATCHv2' and 'libvirt PATCH' Jano