26 Mar
2007
26 Mar
'07
5:22 p.m.
Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 03:39:51PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I'm not sure if this is the right way to solve this, but it is a way.
we should test the return value to check for an error there, the unfortunate thing is that since we are in a signal handler there isn't much we can do, I suggest to increment a global variable (which could for example be checked if we hit that problem by some other code in the main loop). Other ideas ?
How about this patch. It implements your suggestion. Rich.