On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 08:28:54 -0500, John Ferlan wrote:
On 2/18/19 7:51 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 07:38:34 -0500, John Ferlan wrote:
On 2/18/19 7:27 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
Commit dcda2bf4c110 forgot to fix this one instance.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com> --- src/util/virstoragefile.c | 14 ++++++-------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Right fix as far as I'm concerned; however, I am curious to know whether this passes the MinGW build test because this is exactly where things started to break down for VIR_AUTOPTR usage.
We'll see after I push it. I don't have mingw deployed and don't care enough about that platform to do so.
Cannot disagree about the relevance of the importance of MinGW. Still I note it because it was something that caused previous changes to add VIR_AUTOPTR for this module to not be pushed. I was pointed in the direction of Andrea and the lcitool, but TBH that didn't help me much. Eventually I noted that Erik had run a build via some link between travis-ci.org and a github repo. I was able to do something similar and found a similar failure.
I've looked at the ci.centos.org page and the tests were aborted after 90 mins without any error: This is the last output: CC virnettlshelpers.o CC pkix_asn1_tab.o CC virnettlssessiontest.o CC virdbustest-virdbustest.o CC virdbustest-testutils.o Build timed out (after 90 minutes). Marking the build as aborted. Build was aborted Finished: ABORTED Seems to me that it's more an environment or compiler problem.
VIR_AUTOUNREF could also be used more liberally in this module...
I'll not pursue this refactor.
diff --git a/src/util/virstoragefile.c b/src/util/virstoragefile.c index 5927140a66..b2e308d81d 100644 --- a/src/util/virstoragefile.c +++ b/src/util/virstoragefile.c @@ -1119,22 +1119,20 @@ static virStorageSourcePtr virStorageFileMetadataNew(const char *path, int format) { - virStorageSourcePtr def = NULL; + VIR_AUTOUNREF(virStorageSourcePtr) def = NULL; + virStorageSourcePtr ret = NULL;
Erik prefers the usage of VIR_AUTO* defs last (IOW, swap these).
Well I prefer if the returned variable is last and if the longer lines are first.
Picking and choosing which review comments to follow is an interesting decision - hopefully it's not contagious.
Consistency wise, VIR_AUTO* defs have been last. If it's that important I suppose per usual someone can come in afterwards and propose another patch as well as either a rule in/for make check or adjustment to the hacking guide.
Any other variable addition after the block of the VIR_AUTO*stuff will be forgotten sooner or later during review, so if isn't enforced by a syntax check rule, it's pointless to even think to open the editor and change it.