On 02/06/2018 03:54 PM, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 9:09 PM, Jamie Strandboge <jamie@canonical.com> wrote:
On Wed, 2018-01-24 at 10:41 +0100, intrigeri wrote:
Hi,
Guido Günther:
--- a/examples/apparmor/usr.sbin.libvirtd +++ b/examples/apparmor/usr.sbin.libvirtd @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ signal (send) peer=/usr/sbin/dnsmasq, signal (read, send) peer=libvirt-*, - signal (send) set=("kill") peer=unconfined, + signal (send) set=("kill", "term") peer=unconfined,
LGTM too. +1 to apply.
2 x +1 1x resolved Discussion
IMHO nothing should block this from being committed - so ping?
+1 from me as well btw
I've just pushed this. BTW: haven't DV granted commit access to somebody just recently so that they can push these apparmor patches? Michal