On 07/19/2012 01:13 AM, Hendrik Schwartke wrote:
The access, birth, modification and change times are added to storage volumes and corresponding xml representations. --- docs/formatstorage.html.in | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ docs/schemas/storagevol.rng | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ src/conf/storage_conf.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ src/conf/storage_conf.h | 13 +++++++++++++ src/storage/storage_backend.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ 5 files changed, 121 insertions(+)
diff --git a/docs/formatstorage.html.in b/docs/formatstorage.html.in index d0e4319..d8ffbea 100644 --- a/docs/formatstorage.html.in +++ b/docs/formatstorage.html.in @@ -141,6 +141,20 @@ <mode>0744</mode> <label>virt_image_t</label> </permissions> + <timestamps> + <atime> + <sec>1341933637</sec> + <nsec>27319099</nsec>
Just because C can't represent struct timespec as a single number doesn't mean that our XML has to suffer; I still think %d.%09lld is a better format than splitting <sec> and <nsec> into separate elements. On the other hand, will XPath queries of the XML be easier if it is a floating point number compared to two different elements? Does anyone else have an opinion on which color to paint this bikeshed? -- Eric Blake eblake@redhat.com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org