After my change to the original patch that resulted in commit
8ed874b39b3 it was brought to my attention that all three defines
are the same: FICLONE = BTRFS_IOC_CLONE = XFS_IOC_CLONE.
Therefore we should prefer generic FICLONE over 'specific'
defines for btrfs/xfs.
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn(a)redhat.com>
---
src/storage/storage_util.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/storage/storage_util.c b/src/storage/storage_util.c
index da99043e0a..715d5c2f88 100644
--- a/src/storage/storage_util.c
+++ b/src/storage/storage_util.c
@@ -46,14 +46,14 @@
# include <selinux/selinux.h>
#endif
-#if HAVE_LINUX_BTRFS_H
+#ifdef FICLONE
+# define REFLINK_IOC_CLONE FICLONE
+#elif HAVE_LINUX_BTRFS_H
# include <linux/btrfs.h>
# define REFLINK_IOC_CLONE BTRFS_IOC_CLONE
#elif HAVE_XFS_XFS_H
# include <xfs/xfs.h>
# define REFLINK_IOC_CLONE XFS_IOC_CLONE
-#elif defined(FICLONE)
-# define REFLINK_IOC_CLONE FICLONE
#endif
#include "datatypes.h"
--
2.16.4