On 10.04.2013 12:08, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange(a)redhat.com>
Currently if virCgroupMakeGroup fails, we can get in a situation
where some controllers have been setup, but others not. Ensure
we call virCgroupRemove to remove what we've done upon failure
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange(a)redhat.com>
---
src/util/vircgroup.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/util/vircgroup.c b/src/util/vircgroup.c
index d3c43a2..bcc61a8 100644
--- a/src/util/vircgroup.c
+++ b/src/util/vircgroup.c
@@ -1081,8 +1081,10 @@ int virCgroupNewDriver(const char *name,
rc = virCgroupNew(name, rootgrp, -1, group);
if (rc == 0) {
rc = virCgroupMakeGroup(rootgrp, *group, create, VIR_CGROUP_NONE);
- if (rc != 0)
+ if (rc != 0) {
+ virCgroupRemove(*group);
virCgroupFree(group);
+ }
}
out:
virCgroupFree(&rootgrp);
@@ -1154,8 +1156,10 @@ int virCgroupNewDomain(virCgroupPtr driver,
* cumulative usage that we don't need.
*/
rc = virCgroupMakeGroup(driver, *group, create, VIR_CGROUP_MEM_HIERACHY);
- if (rc != 0)
+ if (rc != 0) {
+ virCgroupRemove(*group);
virCgroupFree(group);
+ }
}
return rc;
@@ -1201,8 +1205,10 @@ int virCgroupNewVcpu(virCgroupPtr domain,
if (rc == 0) {
rc = virCgroupMakeGroup(domain, *group, create, VIR_CGROUP_NONE);
- if (rc != 0)
+ if (rc != 0) {
+ virCgroupRemove(*group);
virCgroupFree(group);
+ }
}
return rc;
@@ -1241,8 +1247,10 @@ int virCgroupNewEmulator(virCgroupPtr domain,
if (rc == 0) {
rc = virCgroupMakeGroup(domain, *group, create, VIR_CGROUP_NONE);
- if (rc != 0)
+ if (rc != 0) {
+ virCgroupRemove(*group);
virCgroupFree(group);
+ }
}
return rc;
Funny, shouldn't we make virCgroupMakeGroup() to cleanup on failure?
But I can live with this version as well.
Michal