On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 06:41:43AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
On 01/22/2014 03:37 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 11:37:16AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
>> Use of ${BASH_SOURCE[0]} is a syntax error in dash.
>> Use of `` is pointless when we know we are in bash.
>>
>> * scripts/lsn2text: Make more robust.
>> * scripts/lsn2html: Likewise.
>> * scripts/lsn2indexhtml: Likewise.
>> * scripts/lsn2index: Likewise.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake(a)redhat.com>
>> ---
>> scripts/lsn2html | 4 ++--
>> scripts/lsn2index | 4 ++--
>> scripts/lsn2indexhtml | 4 ++--
>> scripts/lsn2text | 4 ++--
>> 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> ACK, unless there's a better way to write it in general
> shell without $BASE_SOURCE ?
Probably possible; I was just going with the path of least resistance.
If you want me to respin this to be portable to dash, I can spend the
time on that.
I don't mind either way - upto you if you want to spend time on it :-)
Also, I noticed that the web pages at
http://security.libvirt.org
don't
seem to be regenerated, even though it's been more than an hour since I
pushed - are we missing a cron job somewhere, in relation to the claim
made in the README?
I don't see your changes in the public git repo actually.
Daniel
--
|:
http://berrange.com -o-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|:
http://entangle-photo.org -o-
http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|