On 05/13/2015 02:43 PM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 12:32:20 -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
> Coverity points out it's possible for one of the virCommand{Output|Error}*
> API's to have not allocated 'output' and/or 'error' in which case
the
> strstr comparison will cause a NULL deref
>
> Signed-off-by: John Ferlan <jferlan(a)redhat.com>
> ---
> src/storage/storage_backend_disk.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/storage/storage_backend_disk.c b/src/storage/storage_backend_disk.c
> index 6394dac..5c2c49a 100644
> --- a/src/storage/storage_backend_disk.c
> +++ b/src/storage/storage_backend_disk.c
> @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ virStorageBackendDiskFindLabel(const char* device)
>
> /* if parted succeeds we have a valid partition table */
> ret = virCommandRun(cmd, NULL);
> - if (ret < 0) {
> + if (ret < 0 && output && error) {
> if (strstr(output, "unrecognised disk label") ||
> strstr(error, "unrecognised disk label")) {
> ret = 1;
This doesn't seem to be correct if either output or error is NULL and
the other one is non-NULL. I'm too lazy to check if it's possible or
not, but I think we should change this code in the following way and be
safe:
if (ret < 0) {
if ((output && strstr(output, "unrecognised disk label")) ||
(error && strstr(error, "unrecognised disk label"))) {
ret = 1;
Jirka
Sure - seems reasonable, although I suspect if allocation of memory for
the output buffer fails, then allocation of memory for the error buffer
will fail too, but just in case it succeeds...
John