-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Krempa [mailto:pkrempa@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 4:31 PM
To: Ren, Qiaowei <qiaowei.ren(a)intel.com>
Cc: libvir-list(a)redhat.com; berrange(a)redhat.com
Subject: Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 1/1] perf: add support to perf event for MBM
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 14:55:16 +0800, Qiaowei Ren wrote:
> Some Intel processor families (e.g. the Intel Xeon processor E5 v3
> family) introduced some RDT (Resource Director Technology) features to
> monitor or control shared resource. Among these features, MBM (Memory
> Bandwidth Monitoring), which is build on the CMT (Cache Monitoring
> Technology) infrastructure, provides OS/VMM a way to monitor bandwidth
> from one level of cache to another.
>
> With current perf framework, this patch adds support to perf event for
> MBM.
>
> Signed-off-by: Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren(a)intel.com>
> ---
> include/libvirt/libvirt-domain.h | 18 ++++++++++++
> src/qemu/qemu_driver.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++----
> src/util/virperf.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> src/util/virperf.h | 2 ++
> 4 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/libvirt/libvirt-domain.h
> b/include/libvirt/libvirt-domain.h
> index 160f20f..e4594f0 100644
> --- a/include/libvirt/libvirt-domain.h
> +++ b/include/libvirt/libvirt-domain.h
> @@ -1904,6 +1904,24 @@ void
virDomainStatsRecordListFree(virDomainStatsRecordPtr *stats);
> */
> # define VIR_PERF_PARAM_CMT "cmt"
>
> +/**
> + * VIR_PERF_PARAM_MBMT:
> + *
> + * Macro for typed parameter name that represents MBMT perf event
> + * which can be used to monitor total system bandwidth (bytes/s)
> + * from one level of cache to another.
> + */
> +# define VIR_PERF_PARAM_MBMT "mbmt"
> +
> +/**
> + * VIR_PERF_PARAM_MBML:
> + *
> + * Macro for typed parameter name that represents MBML perf event
> + * which can be used to monitor the amount of data (bytes/s) sent
> + * through the memory controller on the socket.
> + */
> +# define VIR_PERF_PARAM_MBML "mbml"
So I was a little bit mistaken what this is documenting. So these document the
arguments for virDomainSetPerfEvents where the perf stuff is enabled.
I was actually thinking this is documenting the values that are returned via the
virConnectGetAllDomainStats/virDomainListGetStats APIs. I've just noticed that
the perf events are not documented at all there.
This should be fixed also for the CMT event. This part of the documentation
should then state which fields in the *Stats APIs the perf events correspond to.
In the documentation for the fields returned bulk Stats API the individual fields
should be marked by which event they are produced.
Sure. The documentation will be added.
> +
> int virDomainGetPerfEvents(virDomainPtr dom,
> virTypedParameterPtr *params,
> int *nparams, diff --git
> a/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c b/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c index
> c4c4968..a3bd7ec 100644
> --- a/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c
> +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c
> @@ -10051,6 +10051,8 @@ qemuDomainSetPerfEvents(virDomainPtr dom,
>
> if (virTypedParamsValidate(params, nparams,
> VIR_PERF_PARAM_CMT,
> VIR_TYPED_PARAM_BOOLEAN,
> + VIR_PERF_PARAM_MBMT, VIR_TYPED_PARAM_BOOLEAN,
> + VIR_PERF_PARAM_MBML,
> + VIR_TYPED_PARAM_BOOLEAN,
> NULL) < 0)
> return -1;
>
> @@ -19495,20 +19497,38 @@ qemuDomainGetStatsBlock(virQEMUDriverPtr
> driver, #undef QEMU_ADD_COUNT_PARAM
>
> static int
> -qemuDomainGetStatsPerfCmt(virPerfPtr perf,
> +qemuDomainGetStatsPerfRdt(virPerfPtr perf,
> + virPerfEventType type,
> virDomainStatsRecordPtr record,
> int *maxparams) {
> - uint64_t cache = 0;
> + uint64_t value = 0;
>
> - if (virPerfReadEvent(perf, VIR_PERF_EVENT_CMT, &cache) < 0)
> + if (virPerfReadEvent(perf, type, &value) < 0)
> return -1;
>
> - if (virTypedParamsAddULLong(&record->params,
> + if (type == VIR_PERF_EVENT_CMT &&
> + virTypedParamsAddULLong(&record->params,
> &record->nparams,
> maxparams,
> "perf.cache",
> - cache) < 0)
> + value) < 0)
> + return -1;
> +
> + if (type == VIR_PERF_EVENT_MBMT &&
> + virTypedParamsAddULLong(&record->params,
> + &record->nparams,
> + maxparams,
> + "perf.total_bytes",
If you pass this string into this function you won't need to special case all the
different types.
Also by naming the fields similarly to the name of the feature (virPerfEvent enum)
you could entirely avoid the need to pass the name of the value as it could be
generated by the virPerfEventTypeToString.
(concatenate it with 'perf.' to get 'perf.mbmt', 'perf.cmt' and
'perf.mbml').
Unfortunately the implementation of the CMT event already used a different
name for the stats entry.
Since this actually was never documented I would be in favor of changing
perf.cache to perf.cmt, so that the macros can be used. I cc'd danpb who
reviewed and pushed the first impl for another opinion.
Yes. I guess also that the new perf feature should be not used by customers and maybe we
can change perf.cache to perf.cmt. Otherwise we can only use the macros for mbmt &
mbml
Thanks,
Qiaowei