On Fri, 2019-08-16 at 17:10 +0200, Fabiano FidĂȘncio wrote:
Let's refresh the archived Dockerfiles in order to have the
fedora-30
containers performing the MinGW builds (instead of the fedora-rawhide
ones).
s/fedora-30/Fedora 30/
s/fedora-rawhide/Fedora Rawhide/
[...]
buildenv-libosinfo-fedora-30.zip | Bin 489 -> 551
bytes
buildenv-libosinfo-fedora-rawhide.zip | Bin 572 -> 507 bytes
buildenv-libosinfo-ubuntu-16.zip | Bin 558 -> 558 bytes
buildenv-libosinfo-ubuntu-18.zip | Bin 558 -> 558 bytes
buildenv-libvirt-centos-7.zip | Bin 662 -> 662 bytes
[...]
buildenv-libvirt-fedora-30.zip | Bin 695 -> 809
bytes
buildenv-libvirt-fedora-rawhide.zip | Bin 828 -> 714 bytes
buildenv-libvirt-ubuntu-16.zip | Bin 784 -> 784 bytes
buildenv-libvirt-ubuntu-18.zip | Bin 783 -> 783 bytes
70 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
Why so much churn? I would expect exactly four files to be changed
by this commit.
I guess we're not creating our archives in a reproducible fashion, so
even if the contents of the Dockerfile are the same we still end up
with a nominally different archive.
[...]
Binary files a/buildenv-libvirt-fedora-30.zip and
b/buildenv-libvirt-fedora-30.zip differ
diff --git a/buildenv-libvirt-fedora-rawhide.zip b/buildenv-libvirt-fedora-rawhide.zip
index 05ed350..13fe28f 100644
Binary files a/buildenv-libvirt-fedora-rawhide.zip and
b/buildenv-libvirt-fedora-rawhide.zip differ
diff --git a/buildenv-libvirt-ubuntu-16.zip b/buildenv-libvirt-ubuntu-16.zip
index 8cff046..f336d96 100644
Binary files a/buildenv-libvirt-ubuntu-16.zip and b/buildenv-libvirt-ubuntu-16.zip
differ
diff --git a/buildenv-libvirt-ubuntu-18.zip b/buildenv-libvirt-ubuntu-18.zip
index 83546be..9e7126c 100644
Binary files a/buildenv-libvirt-ubuntu-18.zip and b/buildenv-libvirt-ubuntu-18.zip differ
git rightfully refuses to apply this patch, since... Well, there is
no patch! Just the description of one :)
This, along with the above, means we have still some work ahead of
us to adapt to the new container creation workflow.
Anyway, I've refreshed the Dockerfiles locally and the diff looks
good, so
Reviewed-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna(a)redhat.com>
--
Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization