On Tue, 2018-10-02 at 17:26 +0200, Peter Krempa wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 16:43:04 +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
[...]
> Eh, nothing in this series is really meant to be pushed :)
Such approach without any obvious markers is only warranted on 1st of
April.
I figured the series being marked as RFC, along with the cover letter
containing a "Known issues" section mentioning how the implementation
completely fails to work in one out of two sample scenarios, would be
enough to tip readers off.
How do you recommend I make it more obvious next time?
--
Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization